Skip to main content

📘 Power and Prediction – Chapter 4

🔍 To Decide or Not to Decide​

This chapter introduces the first of three broad themes in Part Two ("Rules"): how decisions are shaped by prediction, cognitive load, and the balance between rules vs flexibility. It unpacks a fundamental trade-off in human and organizational behavior — when to decide and when to follow a rule.

🧠 Core Insight​

Making decisions is expensive. It consumes mental energy, time, and attention.
Rules are pre-decisions. They reduce cost and increase reliability — at the price of adaptability.
AI as prediction technology changes this trade-off. It makes decisions cheaper by reducing uncertainty, and therefore challenges the dominance of rigid rules.

🧩 Key Concepts​

1. 🧠 Cognitive Cost of Decisions​

  • Humans experience mental fatigue when making repeated decisions — we tend to decide not to decide when stakes are low or info is costly.
  • Classic example: Steve Jobs, Obama, and Zuckerberg wore the same clothes to avoid minor daily decisions.

2. 🛠️ Rules as Cognitive Offloading​

  • Rules simplify choices by preemptively deciding based on generalized logic.
  • In organizations, this shows up as standard operating procedures (SOPs) and workflows that improve reliability across interdependent teams.

3. 🔁 Decisions vs Rules: Trade-Off​

FactorChoose DecisionChoose Rule
High consequence✅🚫
High cost of info🚫✅
Need for situational nuance✅🚫
Low stakes🚫✅

4. 💡 The Role of Prediction​

  • Prediction makes decisions less costly by providing relevant, timely information.
  • When prediction improves, the benefit of real-time decisions increases, making rule-following less necessary.
  • AI flips the balance: it enables decision systems where we previously relied on rule systems.

🌦️ Example: The Umbrella Dilemma​

If the weather forecast is unreliable and the consequence of rain is low, you might follow a rule: “Always carry an umbrella.”
But if prediction improves, you’ll shift to deciding: “Check forecast, decide based on data.”

🧠 Takeaways​

  • Decision-making is costly — not just in outcome, but in mental bandwidth.
  • Rules reduce complexity, but also suppress flexibility and responsiveness.
  • AI-powered predictions make decision-making more attractive again — lowering its cost and improving its quality.
  • The future of strategy may depend on where you switch from rules to responsive decisions.